‘The dangers of letting articles influence
investment decisions’
Markets: The investor’s dilemma
|
Stocks are
expensive. Bonds are expensive. What is an investor to do? Unfortunately, the
only answer appears to be to invest in new and...
The full article can
be found at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/efa26a96-e98f-11e2-bf03-00144feabdc0.html
|
Mr. Gerard Colaco: Over the last three decades, we have come across any number of articles
of the kind forwarded by you from the Financial Times. The overwhelming
majority of such articles are very well written, very erudite and very wrong.
No country of the world in the last two centuries has been written off
more and more often than the United States. So far all these doomsday
predictions have been wrong.
You have tried to apply
some of the contents and predictions in the article to personal investment.
Let me try to provide you with some knowledge which should enable you to
take all such articles you may come across in the future with not a pinch, but
a wagon-load of salt.
You might have heard of a
Jewish holy book called the Talmud. In 1,200 BC, Rabbi Isaac wrote: "Let
every man divide his money into 3 parts, and invest a third in land, a third in
business and a third let him keep by him in reserve." This is quoted
by Roger C Gibson right at the beginning of his masterwork "Asset
Allocation: Balancing Financing Risk". This is a classic on
asset allocation.
Where personal investment
is concerned, there is not much we have learnt in 3,000 years that's new and
effective. We have of course seen much that is new and ineffective.
The point at which the Talmud started was asset allocation. The highest
point we have ever reached in personal investment after a 3,000-year journey is
asset allocation. In between you mostly have hype with a capital H.
If you implement Rabbi
Isaac's asset allocation strategy to today's world, it would recommend that an
investor deploy a third of his funds in real estate, a third in equity and a
third in short-term bonds. By any stretch of imagination, this is an
excellent strategy for even a novice investor. That's why I say that we
have not made much progress in personal investment over three millennia.
Anything that facilitates
or increases diversification is excellent. Anything that doesn't is
financial journalism. Asset allocation is the highest form of
diversification. Asset allocation would also include international diversification.
And international diversification would include exposure to the US, the
world's major economy, regardless of doomsday predictions about it.
Asset allocation and
diversification have survived across 3000 years. Predictions haven't.
And if by luck rather than skill, this particular prediction comes true,
so what? It will only provide people like us with an opportunity to buy
into a cheap US equity market. We already have an SIP into the US feeder
fund of Franklin Templeton India. We will not hesitate to make lump sum
investments when the Dow says "Oww...!".